Conspiracy theories or proven/studied scientific facts?
by 
ANSWERS: 5
-
9/11 what do you reckon the world is full of sh-t. We all must love lies.
-
-
Creamcrackered https://youtube.com/shorts/gJa4vhHyn5Q?si=LOaGtQaoPDDvtsT5 People have become conditioned to think conspiracy theorist is a dirty word, people don't want to be thought as mad, but if those same people bothered to look at how many were true, well then it proves how some aren't afraid of thinking for themselves, and ignoring their instinct and their own two eyes -
Creamcrackered https://youtu.be/D1t4KYNjHPY?si=Uby02126Z-JZCk0h
-
11stevo73 I like redacted
-
-
If you're saying that 911 was an inside job, and we never went to the moon, then that's about as likely as Obamas wife having a dick, Big Mike.
-
Conspiracy theories are interesting. They are more often refined than refuted. While supposedly scientific facts work on the assumption that repeatable observations are probably true.
-
A bit of both. Certain conspiracies have some truth in them while scientific facts are realistic with physical evidence. Just don’t ask me what conspiracies have a ring of truth in them because it’s better not to argue about it and keep the peace.
-
-
11stevo73
why not tell it like it is? Are you to gutless to say what you think?
-
-
Go with the experts
-
-
11stevo73
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Richard Gage worked as an architect for 20 years and was involved in the construction of numerous "fireproof" steel-frame buildings
-
Jenny The Great ⭐ 
Shadow Of The Mind RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC