What you're seeing are responses stemming from a one-sided history. They've been told all their lives that Hitler was the epitome of evil with no mention of opposing documented facts. You can't form an accurate viewpoint with one-sided facts. ¶ Another important aspect that figures into it is the exploitation of the emotional response. Since around the turn of the century (20th) and long before anyone heard of Hitler, the political Zionists were flooding the media with sympathetic stories of 6 million Jews being persecuted in Europe and threatened with extermination. History claims that it was a campaign to raise awareness of the plight of the Jews so that a homeland for the Jews could be established in Palestine. But it wasn't to create a homeland for the Jews - it was to establish a political state in Palestine where the Zionists could become a powerful state and the British could get rich exploiting the area's natural resources. Had they (Zionists) been honest from the beginning, they wouldn't have stood a chance to create the Jewish state of Israel - no one would have supported the creation of a political state. But they were quickly responsive to the plight of the persecuted Jews, and this is why the Zionists used this angle, instead. Their very existence is through the use of sympathy. If you can make people feel sorry for you, you can wrap them around your finger and get them to do anything for you. ¶ To drive that last statement home, see how political correctness has all but destroyed the morals of society. People are forced to put up with things they can see for themselves as being wrong - just for the sake of not offending someone.

I agree with you and we think alike.

That would make you a murderer. You have just become what you claim to oppose.

LOL! - "gas oven"? Get an education.

Lol

You seem to adore Stalin. Do you know anything about the Holodomor? It was a man-made famine that killed millions of people in Ukraine in 1932-33 - this was Stalin's doing. Then there was the Katyn Forrest massacre where 22,000 Polish military officers were murdered in 1943 - also Stalin's doing. Then there were the final days of the war when Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and the Soviet soldiers were being threatened with, "you either stay and get killed by the Germans or we'll kill you if you don't". Have you never noticed (or just don't care) that Youtube is okay with Soviet genocide and everything that supports the western narrative but censors everything that shows Germany in a defensive light? You can say that it's because Germany killed millions of Jews, but without the opportunity to examine and dispute that claim, it becomes nothing more than speculation - one that can never be resolved because it leans favorably in the direction of the western narrative. This is what I meant when I've always said that WW2 was the only one-sided event in history. Everywhere you look, the same thing happens. The narrative leans one way and to question any of it leads to accusations of "antisemitism". This, in itself, should raise all kinds of red flags. The truth fears no investigation. Yet, you have the purveyors of "antisemitism" and all things Jewish dictating what is allowed and what isn't. So where do you lean on the current Ukraine issue? Do you favor the West's position to oppose Putin, or are you still loyal to Russia?

There is no need to cry about it. Every country has a dark side. The American Civil War is a good example in how slavery played the central role. Nazi Germany launched a surprise attack against the Soviet Union, known as Operation Barbarosa in 1939 - its supposedly ally in the war of Poland. The German attack on the Soviet Union marked a turning point in both the history of WW2 and the Holocaust. BTW, Putin is irrelevant in this subject. The question asks about Hitler who is in the history books of World War II.

Can you prove he did anything wrong? The only "proof" of his "guilt" is hearsay evidence, first by the Soviets, and then by the entire Western world. There is documented evidence that proves just the opposite but it is nearly impossible to access because it doesn't support the one-sided narrative that people have been taught to recite in such discussions. Instead, photos depicting piles of people's belongings (that have no direct connection to gas chambers or any other instrument of death) are offered as "proof". People are *told* a sad story with tear-jerking music in the background. It's indoctrination through the power of suggestion.