Well...the question lacks specificity. That is to say: it's quite ambiguous as it is worded. Attempting to pin down some ideas specifically while answering the question * * * Scientists have observed biological evolution both "in the lab" and "in nature", so we KNOW that biological evolution DOES OCCUR. * * * Now: the idea that the multiplicity of species on Earth is due to biological evolution, and SOLELY to biological evolution (as the theory of evolution contends) ***has not been proved***. There is CONSIDERABLE supporting evidence for the proposition (so much that it seems quite likely to be true), but said evidence is **by no means** conclusive.

The simplest answer is "pro-creation". It has been going on since day one, and not just with people - plants and animals are part of the process, as well.

From what I've read, the theory of evolution is supported by the thought process that a human baby could not survive in the world and so man had to come from an animal that was able to survive as a young animal. Also, pointed out that man has what is termed as human vestigiality, this involves those traits (such as organs or behaviours) occurring in humans that have lost all or most of their original function through evolution. Although structures called vestigial often appear functionless, a vestigial structure may retain lesser functions or develop minor new ones. In some cases, structures once identified as vestigial simply had an unrecognized function. Vestigal organs are sometimes called rudimentary organs. The examples of human vestigiality are numerous, including the anatomical (such as the human tailbone, wisdom teeth, and inside corner of the eye), the behavioural (goose bumps and palmar grasp reflex), and molecular (pseudogenes). Many human characteristics are also vestigial in other primates and related animals. When Darwin wrote The Origin of Species by Natural Selection Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Existence, which was an idea taken from his Grandfather 33rd degree Freemason Eramus Darwin's Zoonomia, he assumed that in time there would be found evidence of one species evolving into another. However, that never came about until the Piltdown Man which despite there being doubts about authenticity was used as evidence for mans evolution over 40 years before being found a fake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man Interestingly, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin a Jesuit who discovered the Peking Man which became the centre of anthropological discussion, and classified as a direct human ancestor, propping up the Out of Asia hypothesis that humans evolved in Asia, was also involved in the Piltman hoax with Charles Dawson and Arthur Smith Woodward. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Teilhard_de_Chardin

The evolutionary view of the fossil record is bad science and is the modern equivalent of phrenology. Do some studying on skull #5 from Dmanisi.

We can see the evolution of differences in species. For example, different species of dogs, cats, fish, canaries. worms etc. Actually I think Aliens populated the planet with different species from other planets and perhaps different dimensions. Its a far-out theory but it makes more sense than "God created the Heavens and the Earth" lol

they cant count properly according to Christian scientists